Financial Tools
  Client Portfolio Access
  New Client Kit
  Enquiry / Seminar Registration
Hot Issues
Good financial planning finally has a value: 23% more in retirement
The new 65?
Report reveals 'alarming' super savings stats
Anchors aweigh!
A retiree's choice: super pension or lump sum
Fundamentals for investing success
Market Update - June 2014
Messages Worth Remembering
Workforce rides the 'silver tsunami'
ATO outlines SuperStream concerns for SMSFs
Help investor's to save $82 per week
Super dollars
Market Update - May 2014
Market Update - April 2014
How familiar are you with this graph?
Federal Budget 2014-15 - Overview
Federal Budget 2014-15 - Overview of main responsibilities
Federal Budget Papers 2014-15
Keeping a close watch on contribution caps
Any changes to the Age Pension make saving through super crucial: ASAF
New insights into women and super
Keeping super in the family
Afternoon Thoughts (US, Asia and Europe)
Articles archive
Quarter 2 April - June 2014
Quarter 1 January - March 2014
Quarter 4 October - December 2013
Quarter 3 July - September 2013
Quarter 2 April - June 2013
Quarter 1 January - March 2013
Quarter 4 October - December 2012
Quarter 3 July - September 2012
Quarter 2 April - June 2012
Quarter 1 January - March 2012
Quarter 4 October - December 2011
Quarter 3 July - September 2011
Quarter 2 April - June 2011
Quarter 1 January - March 2011
Quarter 4 October - December 2010
Quarter 3 July - September 2010
Quarter 2 April - June 2010
Quarter 1 January - March 2010
Quarter 4 October - December 2009
Quarter 3 July - September 2009
Quarter 2 April - June 2009
Quarter 1 January - March 2009
Quarter 4 October - December 2008
Quarter 3 July - September 2008
Quarter 2 April - June 2008
Quarter 1 January - March 2008
Quarter 4 October - December 2007
Quarter 3 July - September 2007
Quarter 2 April - June 2007
Quarter 1 January - March 2007
Quarter 4 October - December 2006
Quarter 3 July - September 2006
Quarter 2 April - June 2006
SMSF: Costs versus performance

 

One of the most interesting findings in a new tax office report - Self-Managed Superannuation Funds - A Statistical Overview - is that ..






.. the bigger the balance, the better the performance during the financial years examined.

This finding is perhaps not surprising given that larger SMSFs typically have markedly lower
costs - as a proportion of their assets - than their smaller counterparts. And
larger SMSFs can afford to spend more on professional financial planning and
tax advice.


Smart Investing initially looked at this ATO report last week (Inside story on SMSFs and SMSFs winning on cost control ).


Based on SMSF tax and regulatory returns, the ATO estimates that in 2009-10, the average rate
of return for SMSFs according to asset size was:


  • Up to $50,000 in assets: -8.64 per cent.
  • $50,000-$100,000 in assets: -1.48 per cent.
  • $100,000-$200,000 in assets: 2.46 per cent.
  • $200,000-$500,000 in assets: 5.23 per cent.
  • $500,000-$1 million in assets: 6.87 per cent.
  • $1 million-$2 million in assets: 7.71 per cent.
  • Above $2 million: 8.90 per cent in assets.

These returns should reinforce to anyone considering whether to setup an SMSF that asset size
and costs really influence the feasibility of having your own fund. (The cost
issue was discussed by Smart Investing in last week's blogs mentioned above.)


Read this tax office report on SMSFs.


 


By Robin Bowerman
Smart Investing
Principal & Head of Retail, Vanguard Investments Australia


24th April 2012





18th-June-2012

  Financial Advisor | Financial Planner | Financial Adviser | Financial Planning | Financial Planner Sydney