Financial Tools
  Client Portfolio Access
  New Client Kit
  Enquiry / Seminar Registration
Hot Issues
How familiar are you with this graph?
Keeping a close watch on contribution caps
Any changes to the Age Pension make saving through super crucial: ASAF
New insights into women and super
Keeping super in the family
Afternoon Thoughts (US, Asia and Europe)
Market Update - March 2014
Younger SMSF members
SMSF Specialist wanted
Aged Care
Crowd control
Philanthropy upswing
Market Update - 28th February 2014
Resources on our site to help you and your family.
SMSF investment process is broken, but a good financial planner can fix it
A behavioural barrier to successful saving
Spending of super lump sums
What the past can teach us about the current emerging turmoil
Some terms defined - Super & Investment
Spending control in a low-interest environment
Market Update - January 2014
The return of a resilient US
Putting financial literacy to the test.
No intention to retire
Outlook for Japan in 2014
Articles archive
Quarter 1 January - March 2014
Quarter 4 October - December 2013
Quarter 3 July - September 2013
Quarter 2 April - June 2013
Quarter 1 January - March 2013
Quarter 4 October - December 2012
Quarter 3 July - September 2012
Quarter 2 April - June 2012
Quarter 1 January - March 2012
Quarter 4 October - December 2011
Quarter 3 July - September 2011
Quarter 2 April - June 2011
Quarter 1 January - March 2011
Quarter 4 October - December 2010
Quarter 3 July - September 2010
Quarter 2 April - June 2010
Quarter 1 January - March 2010
Quarter 4 October - December 2009
Quarter 3 July - September 2009
Quarter 2 April - June 2009
Quarter 1 January - March 2009
Quarter 4 October - December 2008
Quarter 3 July - September 2008
Quarter 2 April - June 2008
Quarter 1 January - March 2008
Quarter 4 October - December 2007
Quarter 3 July - September 2007
Quarter 2 April - June 2007
Quarter 1 January - March 2007
Quarter 4 October - December 2006
Quarter 3 July - September 2006
Quarter 2 April - June 2006
SMSF: Costs versus performance

 

One of the most interesting findings in a new tax office report - Self-Managed Superannuation Funds - A Statistical Overview - is that ..






.. the bigger the balance, the better the performance during the financial years examined.

This finding is perhaps not surprising given that larger SMSFs typically have markedly lower
costs - as a proportion of their assets - than their smaller counterparts. And
larger SMSFs can afford to spend more on professional financial planning and
tax advice.


Smart Investing initially looked at this ATO report last week (Inside story on SMSFs and SMSFs winning on cost control ).


Based on SMSF tax and regulatory returns, the ATO estimates that in 2009-10, the average rate
of return for SMSFs according to asset size was:


  • Up to $50,000 in assets: -8.64 per cent.
  • $50,000-$100,000 in assets: -1.48 per cent.
  • $100,000-$200,000 in assets: 2.46 per cent.
  • $200,000-$500,000 in assets: 5.23 per cent.
  • $500,000-$1 million in assets: 6.87 per cent.
  • $1 million-$2 million in assets: 7.71 per cent.
  • Above $2 million: 8.90 per cent in assets.

These returns should reinforce to anyone considering whether to setup an SMSF that asset size
and costs really influence the feasibility of having your own fund. (The cost
issue was discussed by Smart Investing in last week's blogs mentioned above.)


Read this tax office report on SMSFs.


 


By Robin Bowerman
Smart Investing
Principal & Head of Retail, Vanguard Investments Australia


24th April 2012





18th-June-2012

  Financial Advisor | Financial Planner | Financial Adviser | Financial Planning | Financial Planner Sydney